Comparative safety and efficacy of ozanimod versus fingolimod for relapsing multiple sclerosis

E Swallow, O Patterson-Lomba, L Yin… - Journal of …, 2020 - becarispublishing.com
E Swallow, O Patterson-Lomba, L Yin, R Mehta, C Pelletier, D Kao, JK Sheffield…
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 2020becarispublishing.com
Aim: Ozanimod and fingolimod are sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor–modulating therapies
for relapsing multiple sclerosis. Patients & methods: Comparative effectiveness was
assessed by matching adjusted indirect comparisons of safety and efficacy trial outcomes at
first-dose cardiac monitoring, 1 year and 2 years. Results: After adjustment, baseline
characteristics were similar. Ozanimod was associated with a lower risk of extended first-
dose monitoring, conduction abnormalities including atrioventricular block. One-year risks of …
Aim
Ozanimod and fingolimod are sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor–modulating therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis.
Patients & methods
Comparative effectiveness was assessed by matching adjusted indirect comparisons of safety and efficacy trial outcomes at first-dose cardiac monitoring, 1 year and 2 years.
Results
After adjustment, baseline characteristics were similar. Ozanimod was associated with a lower risk of extended first-dose monitoring, conduction abnormalities including atrioventricular block. One-year risks of any adverse event (AE), mean lymphocyte count reductions and abnormal liver enzymes were lower with ozanimod. Two-year risks of AEs leading to discontinuation, any AEs, herpetic infections, bradycardia and abnormal liver enzymes were lower with ozanimod. Analyses of efficacy outcomes were similar.
Conclusion
Ozanimod appears to have a favorable benefit-risk profile versus fingolimod.
Becaris Publishing